Teen kills classmate, injures 8 in school shooting in San Cristóbal, Argentina.

NEWS:

A 15-year-old student opened fire inside a school in San Cristóbal, Argentina, killing a 13-year-old classmate and injuring eight other students in an attack that shattered a small city, widened into a broader criminal investigation, and reopened a national debate over school safety, youth violence, and how Argentina handles serious crimes committed by minors.

The core act is not in doubt. Video tied to the attack shows the shooting unfolding inside the school setting as students scramble for cover, and the fatal assault itself is treated here as a documented event, not a possibility or a disputed version. What is still being investigated are the deeper questions around preparation, access to the weapon, whether anyone else helped, and what warning signs may have been missed before the first shot was fired.

The attack happened on the morning of March 30 at Escuela Normal N° 40 Mariano Moreno in the city of San Cristóbal, in Santa Fe province. According to the reporting reviewed for this article, students were gathered in an internal courtyard shortly before the school day fully got underway, waiting for the flag ceremony, when the 15-year-old, armed with a shotgun, began firing. The victim, a 13-year-old first-year student, was hit and died at the school. Argentine press reports also said eight other adolescents were hurt in the chaos, including two with gunshot injuries, one of whom was transferred to Rafaela in serious condition.

The scene spiraled in seconds. Teenagers ran through exits and side areas trying to get away from the blasts. Families rushed toward the school after receiving frantic phone calls. A school assistant then intervened and managed to physically stop the shooter before the toll became even worse. That intervention matters in the factual record because it appears consistently across early coverage and later retellings. The attacker was subdued on site, police took him into custody, and the school grounds were quickly evacuated and sealed off.

There are several layers to what can be stated firmly. It is confirmed that a 15-year-old student brought a shotgun into the school, fired multiple times, killed a 13-year-old classmate, and wounded other students. It is also confirmed that the suspect was apprehended immediately and that provincial authorities launched an emergency response at the school. Beyond that, other details require more caution. Questions about motive, outside influence, prior planning, encrypted chats, mental health history, and the origin of the weapon have all surfaced in later reporting, but many of those points remain part of an active, partially shielded investigation involving minors.

That distinction is especially important in a case like this, because the crime was both public and immediate, yet legally restricted from full public disclosure. Santa Fe justice officials have handled the case under reserve because the people directly involved are minors. Later reporting in Argentina said prosecutors identified the lead investigators as Carina Gerbaldo and Mauricio Spinosa, while regional officials indicated the investigation would move forward without the kind of open-file transparency often seen in adult homicide cases. In practical terms, that means some of the most sensitive details, including testimony, forensic findings, and the suspect’s full statement, have not been released publicly.

The legal path quickly became one of the biggest developments after the shooting itself. Under Argentina’s current framework, children under 16 are generally not criminally punishable in the ordinary sense. By the first week of April, later reports said the accused 15-year-old had been declared not punishable, though he would remain housed in a juvenile institution under protective and custodial measures rather than face a standard criminal trial and sentence. That outcome did not close the case. It changed the legal route, but investigators still had to examine how the attack was planned, how the gun got into the building, and whether others had knowledge of what was coming.

That second question became even more serious days later. By April 10, prosecutors had advanced on a second teenager, accusing him of acting as a secondary participant in the attack. According to the later judicial coverage, the allegation was that he knew about the plan, collaborated with the shooter, and effectively reinforced the crime. A court accepted the charge structure presented by prosecutors for secondary participation in the homicide and in two attempted homicides, and ordered a 90-day placement in a closed juvenile facility. That is one of the clearest reasons the second pass of reporting matters here. The case did not freeze on the day of the shooting. It evolved, and the theory of the attack expanded beyond a single boy with a gun.

Provincial authorities also moved on a parallel track outside the criminal file. The Santa Fe government said the school would stay closed for three days immediately after the attack while the judicial inquiry advanced, and later described an interministerial response involving education, health, child protection, and security agencies. In the days that followed, officials said teams were working with students, teachers, staff, and families through psychological support and staged return plans. By mid-April, the province said the building had been authorized to reopen on a gradual basis, beginning with cleaning, repairs, and organization before students returned in phases.

For San Cristóbal, the damage went far beyond the crime scene. A boy was dead inside a school, classmates had been wounded, parents had watched children run out in panic, and a community small enough for most people to know one another was suddenly dealing with a crime more often associated in the public imagination with the United States than with Argentina. Vigils were held, classes were suspended, and the grief quickly turned into a broader unease about security, prevention, and what adults missed before a teenager walked into school with a shotgun.

The hardest line in this story is also the simplest. A teenager entered a school in San Cristóbal with a shotgun and killed a younger classmate. The video confirms the violence unfolded exactly where students should have been safe. The later investigation suggests the attack may have involved planning and possibly help from another student, but the parts that remain under seal should stay there until authorities prove them. What is already beyond dispute is that one family lost a 13-year-old boy, several other students were hurt, and an ordinary school morning in Santa Fe ended in bloodshed that the city is still trying to absorb.

News story written by DarkGore.

For more on this case:

If you want to know more about this case, just visit the following URL: https://www.infobae.com/sociedad/policiales/2026/03/30/ataque-en-la-escuela-40-de-san-cristobal-santa-fe-ultimas-novedades-sobre-el-alumno-que-mato-a-un-companero-en-el-colegio/